![]() ![]() There are essentially two extant US/NATO policies for a nuclear war. ![]() Let’s talk about a potential nuclear exchange. Maps related to the Cold War have the greater Denver area as a MAJOR target, and no reason to think that has changed for any reason. 90, 80, 70, 40) you effectively cut off California from land support, and it's not much to add Denver/Eisenhower Tunnel to that compilation and you very effectively split the continent in two where ground transport is involved. ![]() If you knock out the handful of mountain passes around the west (eg. If for no other reason, we are a major technical center and a large population area that handles a lot of oil/gas, rail, trucking, etc. Red Dawn wasn't set in the Rockies for the sole reason of scenery or places to hide. Five, a lot of the American land-based missiles are mid-continent to reduce the odds of them being captured during a more traditional invasion scenario. Four, divide the populated coasts by demolishing the middle of the country. Two, NORAD et all & related military even if the bunker remains intact, the network feeding into the mountain can be demolished. One, the Federal Center (effectively DC lite). No concern trolling, gaslighting, misinformation, brigading.Ī few reasons.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |